The clash of worldviews in our nation has cascaded into our educational system, and a debate has arisen pitting the superintendence of the school against that of parents. 摆在桌面上的问题是: 谁负责孩子的教育? 就像现在摆在桌面上的几乎所有问题一样, 对这个问题的答案存在明显的政治分歧.
Proponents of public school posit that government schools must have autonomy in the education of children, 父母没有权利干涉. 在一篇名为， 家长们声称他们有权决定孩子的学校课程. 他们不这样做, 作者认为，
鉴于这种狂热, one might reasonably conclude that radicals are out to curtail the established rights that Americans have over the educational sphere. Yet what’s actually radical here is the assertion of parental powers that have never previously existed. This is not to say that parents should have no influence over how their children are taught. But common law and case law in the United States have long supported the idea that education should prepare young people to think for themselves, 即使这与父母的意愿背道而驰. 用法律学者杰夫·舒尔曼的话来说, “这种努力很可能会使孩子与父母分离, 不是因为社会主义教育者想给孩子们灌输思想, 而是因为孩子们会学着独立思考.
父母和孩子的兴趣什么时候出现分歧? 一般, it occurs when a parent’s desire to inculcate a particular worldview denies the child exposure to other ideas and values that an independent young person might wish to embrace or at least entertain. 把所有的决定权交给父母, 然后, 会有抑制年轻人独立思考能力的风险吗. 正如政治学家罗布·赖克所说, “最低限度的自主权要求, 尤其是它的公民重要性, 让孩子能够审视自己的政治价值观和信仰, 还有其他人, 带着挑剔的眼光.“如果我们重视这一点, “the structure of schooling cannot simply replicate in every particularity the values and beliefs of a child’s home.”
文章确实承认了这一点 “parents have great authority when it comes to deciding how to raise and educate their children” -伟大的权威，而不是绝对的权威. 它表明，如果家长不喜欢公立学校发生的事情, 他们有权去别的地方. 当然，这是真的. Certainly we don’t have the right or power to change everything about the curriculum in government schools, 因为在那个领域有很多世界观. (Perhaps avoiding inculcating children with an instructor’s or administrator’s personal worldview and presenting all sides of an issue with equity could help avoid vitriol in the ideological divide and truly help children decide for themselves, 但这是另一篇文章的主题.)
但问题仍然存在，谁应该对孩子的教育负主要责任?
我们不要助长分歧
One thing I’d like to avoid in this commentary is a politically fueled fracas that feeds the divide. 事实上, when I read this article my initial reaction was a bristling at the arrogance of the elite establishment. 但那是政治用语. 我不希望这场争论带有政治色彩. 我希望它符合圣经. 因为它是.
如果相对论是正确的，那么这篇文章所说的就是正确的. 如果真相是在旁观者的眼中, 然后 parents certainly do have a responsibility to make sure their children are free to explore their own truth, and even encourage exploration of various perspectives in order to land on the 一个适合他们的. 但如果真理是绝对的, 然后 parents have a responsibility to lead their children to it while exploring opposing views as a means to defend their faith. 基督徒肯定后者.
教育权力在哪里
圣经说, parents do and must have absolute authority over the education of their children.
诺亚·韦伯斯特 contended that the responsibility of educating children falls on the shoulders of parents. Even parents who send their children to public school are primarily responsible for making sure Christ is exalted in the things their children are learning while identifying and calling out teaching that is antithetical to biblical instruction.
直到 公立学校的出现和人们的影响 like Horace Mann and John Dewey that the government started to reach into a realm that had long belonged to parents. 这种转变是如此缓慢，几乎觉察不到. 现在，公立学校离基地太远了, 很少有人首先意识到基地是什么, and millions of parents have been content to abdicate their responsibility as the primary source of instruction for their children.
The shift in ideology in public education did not change or negate the biblical mandate for parents to “train up a child” (Proverbs 22:6). BCK体育注册官网孩子的教育，上帝有很多话要说. 从申命记到箴言再到以弗所书, it is clear that God meant for the education of children to be under the purview of parents. 圣经教导父母要训练孩子, 打开, 你们要殷勤将耶和华的教训和教训教训人. 不仅仅是在星期天. 但是“当你坐在家里的时候, 当你走过的时候, 当你躺下时, 你起来的时候”(申6:7)。. 上帝非常重视圣经对孩子们的教导，所以他发出警告, “whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to fall away—it would be better for him if a heavy millstone were hung around his neck and he were drowned in the depths of the sea” (Matthew 18:6). Parents must not abdicate their God-ordained oversight to any entity outside of their sphere of influence.
基督徒应该送孩子去哪里上学
Where Christians send their children to school is a decision that must be made within each family. It is true that sending a child to a private school takes sacrifice and commitment, 决定在家里接受教育也是如此. 把孩子送到公立学校显然在经济上更可行, 但对于一个基督徒父母来说，做这件事必须睁大眼睛. The diversity of worldviews in public schools could lend itself to deeper faith if parents remain vigilant in teaching truth at home, and calling out falsehood in their child’s curriculum against the backdrop of the Bible.
是否选择私立学校, 自主学习, 或者公立学校, it falls on parental shoulders to pray with intention and deliberation for their children, 在他们面前常存神的名, 造物主上帝, who commissioned parents to bring their children up in a way that will glorify him and allow them to enjoy him forever.
在黎明基督教学院, we are committed to raising up the next generation of Christian leaders who acknowledge the Lordship of Jesus Christ in every area of life, 展现圣经的世界观, 在基督教品格和学术上成为优秀的公民, 并帮助恢复美国的圣经基础. 如果你想了解更多BCK体育注册官网黎明基督教学院, please contact Karol Hasting at 717-285-2000 or schedule a private tour using the button below.